Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matt Wright's avatar

Good one.

The only issue with the Grohl analogy (and the analogy is solid) is that it only focuses on cosmetics. People and watches are machines. I am sure if Grohl needed a new hip or a new heart or a melanoma removed from his face that required a skin graft, he wouldn't limp around or let it met to his lung. He would get the new hip and the mole removed and get the skin graft.

The issue isn't really that unpolished/all original isn't the pinnacle. It is and should be. Unpolished all original doesn't need defending. It is fine right where it is.

The issue is that the dealers are directing the market and the market is broken because there is not enough attention to function for normies which makes vintage more difficult.

Maybe the focus shouldn't be defending unpolished/all original. Again - pinnacle, doesnt need defending.

Maybe the focus is segmenting the word collector. It seems that collector doesnt encompass the current zeitgeist which is why you are getting questions. Collector really addresses two distinct groups:

1. Archivist/museum curator - unpolished all original is entirely appropriate and really the only acceptable option. Watches rarely worn outside or day to day. Uber collector. Uber rare pieces, etc.

2. Normie vintage lover. Function is as important as original cosmetics. Running around with rotting lume worrying that it might crack is more of an issue than reluming. Swapping out a crown for a NOS or (gasp) aftermarket to get water resistance and keeping the original in a baggie for safe keeping is more important than worrying about an errant splash or humidity. These vintage watches are meant to be worn rather than put in a safe. This group of watches is also likely not super rare or even all that interesting in most cases. Just old.

Another possible way to help the situation is something along the lines of segmenting the watches. This sounds dumb but:

1. Vintage artifact/art piece. Modification is crime against humanity.

2. Vintage day to day. Modification helps function and is accepted/valued.

Basically this discussion is a market and marketing issue rather than an issue related to the value of unpolished/all original. In these discussions the different vintage types are talking past one another, perhaps, because they are talking about different things. The normie collectors need a market that also serves them. Right now there isn't any.

No idea if that made any sense.

Anyway - good analogy. Good newsletter.

Expand full comment
Aman Brar's avatar

Love the breadth…Patek to Timex

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts